Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbelievable! The Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Unbelievable! The Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced film article, fails WP:NFF with no reliable sources (plural) confirming that principal photography has been completed, and WP:GNG with no sources at all. Best I can find is a single press-release-looking article at startrek.com about the film having wrapped. McGeddon (talk) 22:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Alts:
 * proper title:
 * director:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now as failing WP:NFF and simply being TOO SOON. The film and filmmaker are not completely unsourcable, but we do not have enough coverage yet. It is quite possible, considering the involvement of so many notables, that this will quite possibly have enough coverage when released, and when that happens the article can be resurrected. Apparently now in post, we'll have to wait and see. Schmidt,  Michael Q. 15:48, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - one needs a very big crystal ball for this. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I found the official trailer for it on YouTube. It is dated two years ago.  Odd it isn't out yet, being low budget and all.   D r e a m Focus  19:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: No evidence it meets the GNG, period, even if it wasn't written like prospective ad copy.   Ravenswing   21:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.