Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbroke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Unbroke

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PROD was undone, but I stand by it. Coverage focuses on her relationship with her husband and very little on the album itself. Album can be restored later if more coverage crops up, but this is premature. Restore redirect to artist; I would also support draftification if it's preferred. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 03:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 03:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep tracklisting, cover artwork, lead single, release date, producer, label signing, etc. -- plenty of sourced information on the album by a notable artist besides just information on her husband (which is relevant to the article seeing as it's the literal inspiration for the lead single and many other forthcoming songs on it...). There's been extensive coverage from media outlets already regarding the album since its announcement last week. CloversMallRat (talk) 15:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - While the article's creators might have jumped the gun a little too early, per WP:FUTUREALBUM this is the real deal and all required info has been confirmed in reliable sources. Also, the article is not about her relationship with her husband, it's about how that relationship is the topic of the album's lyrics. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: Sources 3,4 and 5 are about the details behind the album and how it came to be, which is always good to have. I don't see anything wrong with current sourcing, in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 12:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep A proper source with a backstory behind the album's creation and why the subject created it is always appreciated, and 'focuses on her relationship on her husband' is very dismissive as it's the album's very reason for being. This is a country artist who writes songs based on lived experiences, not chiptune techno filler inspired by AI Bitcoin prompts, and it easily meets N/GNG.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.