Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Buck Finance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Uncle Buck Finance

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotion for non notable company. This article is a deceptivly sourced piece that is more about payday loans than it is about this company. The majority of references do not mention Uncle Buck and somtimes do not even verify the claims made. Others are mostly listings or PR. The only thing of note seems to be their appearence in an ITV documentry, but such appearences are not entirely independent. Much of the "Size of market" section is copied directly from one of the sources so may be a copyright issue. - "Payday lending market investigation" (PDF). Competition & Markets Authority, Summary, par. 9 This was declined at afc but just created anyway. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as none of the listed information and sources are convincing enough for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:CORP. sourcing is insufficiently in depth or not third party. LibStar (talk) 08:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.