Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Grandpa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Uncle Grandpa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced and possibly partially fabricated. I saw the creator of the article's only major contribution was this article itself, so I checked to see if there was any copyvio stuff going on. As it turns out, everything after the lead is directly copied (or, it was before I fixed the grammar) from the Cartoon Network Wikia article on Uncle Grandpa from June 2012. Further, it's just too soon to have an article on this series. The IMDB doesn't even have it listed yet that I can find. Paper Luigi T • C 05:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete G12: unambiguous copyvio. (Why did you edit it when you could have just speedied it for copyvio?) Delete. (Copyvio was from Wikia, which is CC-licensed, so it's allowed.) I can confirm that at least the show is real via this official press release, but it's WP:TOOSOON for any other reliable coverage. Also IMDB is usually considered unusable, not credible. czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Last edit:  czar   &middot;   &middot;  08:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't notice it was a copyvio until after I edited it. I guess it would be better for speedy in that case, but considering it's supposedly going to happen anyway, I wasn't quite sure what to do with it. Paper Luigi  T • C 06:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No need to be sorry—I was just curious. But, yes, you can save some time next time with a speedy. czar   &middot;   &middot;  06:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm still not crazy about the source reliability, but it isn't enough to stand in the way of keeping it. czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:41, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment. I've just declined the speedy, as the Wikia content is licensed under CC-BY-SA. There shouldn't be any copyright problems with using it on Wikipedia, as long as it is attributed properly. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 07:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 01:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

 Keep : Lot of sources speak about this upcoming cartoon serial as found after goggling. --Robustdsouza (talk) 19:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Keep: If most of this article's content was just copied from the Cartoon Network Wiki, then it ought to be re-written, but as long as there aren't any copyright problems, I don't see why it would need to be deleted. In addition to the press release linked to by czar and the article from Animation Magazine included in the article, a brief google search revealed the following - Cartoon Brew, tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com, deadline.com, Hollywood Reporter. --Jpcase (talk) 00:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.