Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle vic tap


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  22:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Uncle vic tap

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No results, therefore possible hoax. Fails WP:N anyway.   Asenine   08:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete article doesn't assert notability or and the content does not appear verifiable Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously. Unsourced original research that appears unsourcable.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Longhair\talk 06:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, either a hoax, unverifiable, or a neologism. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete, I really don't see how this could be notable enough. --Roisterer (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Honestly ... -- Mattinbgn\talk 23:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete A million miles from notability Murtoa (talk) 06:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.