Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unconditional Love (Tupac Shakur song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  So Why  07:04, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Unconditional Love (Tupac Shakur song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The song has not appeared on a major music chart. No reliable sources are provided or appear in searches.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - I haven't found much in the way of detailed coverage, but the song's interesting backstory (a song written by Tupac Shakur for MC Hammer) coupled with some rather high level sources mentioning it briefly (ABC News, MTV News) makes me think there's probably more sourcing out there. (This was a 90s song, so it could be locked away in paper sources.) I'm actually probably leaning keep... Sergecross73   msg me  14:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 (c)  20:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 19:03, 31 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm going to comment because of the clear lack of participation in this AfD discussion. A work by Tupac is as notable in some communities as a work by Shakespeare or Picasso. - Richard Cavell (talk) 08:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * that is not a keep rationale. This Tupac song needs extensive secondary coverage just like any other work by any other artist and it clearly fails to do so. It is briefly mentioned it articles about the artist himself but nowhere does it have standalone sources like notable Tupac songs do. Please rethink your vote with a policy-based reason in mind.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.