Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncyclopedia (7th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep. This has gone through multiple AfD nominations. Any new one must make an attempt to refute the arguments about notability already made, or it's pointless. -Amarkov moo! 20:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia
It is not notable. Can we at least move this to Uncyclopedia or something? Ratherduarm 16:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Article does not describe something from Wikipedia, and it is a well known parody to wikipedia. - 17:29, 7 April 2007 209.162.0.183
 * Keep See here for notability. &mdash; Michael Linnear   19:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - This is the second AfD of this article started by the same user today, see Articles for deletion/Uncyclopedia (sixth nomination). I cannot see in either any good reasoning why it isn't notable. I'd suggest it meets the notability criteria. Adambro 19:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.