Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undaground Rap Mixtape Vol.1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect all. Mango juice talk 16:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Undaground Rap Mixtape Vol.1

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This isn't an original album, but a mix CD of other artists' works. Non-notable. Also going to AFD: eaolson 20:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Young Snipe, the artist (artist may be notable, arguably, but these mixes are not)
 * Look, Listen, & Learn, another mix tape
 * Ben Frank:The Mixtape, another mix tape
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 00:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 00:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all as no assertions to notability have been made. In addition, Undaground Rap Mixtape Vol.1 and Ben Frank:The Mixtape are both borderlining on CSD A3, as they have nothing other than a track list and an infobox. -  Zeib ur a  (talk) 03:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Young Snipe. John Vandenberg 02:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Week keep per WP:MUSIC: "If the musician or ensemble that made them is considered notable, then their albums have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." Assuming this was verifiably released by a label, I'd say there's no reason to axe this, although some expansion is obviously needed. Numerous other professionally released Category:Mixtape albums have been kept. That said, the definition of an album in that quote might not be relevant, given that the album was released on the artist's own non-notable label. MrZaius  talk  16:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect The line line in WP:MUSIC about albums inheriting notability is weak and disputed...I default to: Has the album received any indepedent coverage to justify it as an article on its own? No? Merge it into the main article, there's plenty of space. Track listings with no other information are indiscriminate in my opinion. &mdash; Scientizzle 16:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.