Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under the Banyan Tree


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect. Jayjg (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Under the Banyan Tree

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. As seen in this article on the story, there are articles on the book and the author. Not sure if the book article is sufficiently notable, although WP:BK is not hard to satisfy, but the book article doesn't really say anything. Bbb23 (talk) 02:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looking through Notability (books) pretty clear to me that this is one for deletion. --Legis (talk - contribs) 04:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect either to Under the Banyan Tree and Other Stories or to R. K. Narayan. The author is well-enough known that the article title is a plausible search term. PWilkinson (talk) 17:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Under the Banyan Tree and Other Stories which is sometimes shortened to just Under the Banyan Tree, making this a possible search term. The articles as they stand aren't great, but there are sufficient critical reviews available on Gbooks and definitely more offline from newspapers of that time. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.