Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under the Influence (mixtape)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 20:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Under the Influence (mixtape)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable mix tape, all sources attributed to... tumblr. coccyx bloccyx (toccyx)  01:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

 Delete. Sources don't indicate notability. Little interest in saving it it seems.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 12:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 20:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's plenty of coverage of this release, e.g. ,,, , , , , . --Michig (talk) 07:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Thanks to Michig's links. Coverage in 2 major newspapers' websites and other sources. These days mix tapes can be as notable as traditional albums. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig. Very surprising!   Th e S te ve   06:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Michig's findings. The nominator should be reminded of WP:BEFORE, specifically D. Statυs  (talk) 06:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the Tumblr account used in the article is the official blog of Odd Future Records, the label who released the mixtape. For confirmation, it is linked on their official website. Statυs  (talk) 06:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, good job Michig for digging deeper into the subject. - Mailer Diablo 03:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to Odd Future per WP:NALBUMS - "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article". SplashScreen (talk) 20:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per the NALBUMS ans the findings exposed here on the discussion. Regards. — Hahc 21  15:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.