Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undergraduate Business Program at Cornell University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Cornell University -- JForget  00:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Undergraduate Business Program at Cornell University

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

nn and unreferenced part of a part of a uni. No sourced content, nothing worth merging. Bananaqueen (talk) 00:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete we do not give articles to individual majors at individual schools. There is amost never anything particularly notable about them. DGG (talk) 00:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. JJL (talk) 02:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn part of a notable school!notability. THere's no evidence that there's anything special about Cornell's program TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 02:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Definitely does not satisfy general notability guidelines, as there are no secondary sources or any reason for inclusion.— Noetic  Sage  04:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of university deletions. &mdash; Noetic  Sage  04:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. --Canley (talk) 05:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've just finished reading the Sock accusations, and although I agree sockpuppets (and their associated IPs) should be blocked, this nomination is a genuine AfD nomination and it seems like the general consensus so far proves that this article should be deleted.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs  05:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Not notable and sets a bad precedent to every single university creating articles for every single possible degree program in their university.  (Just think of how many separate articles University of Phoenix can whip up alone!!!)  If we don't grant university departments (or faculties for our UK users) their own articles (that fails WP:N), whom essentially runs these programs, there's no reason this particular program in Cornell should have their own separate article.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs  05:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cornell University. Utgard Loki (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable--RedShiftPA (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:N - --Camaeron (talk) 21:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.