Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underground Evolved (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination by another user. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Underground Evolved
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

One reference, possibly unreliable and little information. Fails WP:GNG. Seems to be an article previously deleted. Superchrome (talk) 18:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The use of the past tense in the article implies the label now isn't extant. The one blue-linked artiste's article makes no mention of this label in his collection. All the releases mentioned at discogs are in 2006 - implying that either I may be right about current existence or that discogs are a bit out of date. (They do mention the Apparat release - indeed the whole article is a minimal paraphrase of that discogs 'article'.) Discogs cannot be regarded as a reliable source here on Wikipedia, as it is "a user-built database containing information on artists, labels, and their recordings" (quoted from http://www.discogs.com/help/about-discogs.html). Peridon (talk) 22:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Despite the ban on the initiator of this AfD, I still feel that little notability is shown - and apart from the unreliable (by WP standards) external link, nothing is referenced. Peridon (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 23:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 23:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

This AFD was started by a sock puppet of a banned user in violation of ban. –MuZemike 20:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.