Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underground Evolved (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Underground Evolved
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Little info here, just not notable enough. Previously deleted at AfD. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 11:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, no indication of significance, couldn't find widespread coverage. Hopefully this will be the last AfD. --Pontificalibus (talk) 11:58, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete previous AfD's aren't really relevent as they were both technically flawed. Looking at the article now it doesn't appear to assert notabillity and has no citations either. --ThePaintedOne (talk) 15:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks relevant coverage by reliable independent sources. Fails the GNG. Guoguo12  --Talk--  17:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment UE are still going; the 2nd nom was flawed in that respect too, that they were incorrectly stated to be defunct. Also, one possible reason for that belief is that their home page url, h-t-t-p://r.fm, is for some reason included on a Meta spam blacklist, altho it does not show up on the blacklist list itself, and therefore cannot be added to the article. I have appealed the blacklist inclusion, because the homepage seems to be a stylish and well-managed multimedia site. Anarchangel (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed such a site could be useful, and recent activity could be relevant, but the key issue here is unanimously notability. Guoguo12  --Talk--  20:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.