Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underhill Community Junior School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Fortuneswell.  MBisanz  talk 01:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Underhill Community Junior School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

School is entirely non-notable and although the article is long and comprehensive, there is nothing that warrants its existence per the accepted notability standards for school articles. Bob Re-born (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge verified information to Fortuneswell, the village where this school is located. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Per common outcomes on primary schools I would support that. The reason I listed it at AfD is that the author put a lot of effort into it and I at least wanted to see if others thought there was a reason for saving the article. Obviously as nominator I don't. --Bob Re-born (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There are two claims to notability made in the article: (2) the excellent results noted in the Ofsted report, turning below average students into above average students; and (2) coverage of staffing at the school in news media (in this case, a long standing teacher). It should be noted that there are NO "accepted notability standards for school articles" beyond WP:ORG, primary and junior high schools are NOT automatically non-notable. This article passes the bar. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 15:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Searching for Underhill Junior School turns up quite a few more news results. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 15:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per longstanding consensus for all but the most exceptional primary schools. Carrite (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect Primary schools are generally not considered notable, and this school doesn't seem to be extraordinary enough to be notable. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The applicable guideline WP:ORG is not satisfied, and does not call for any redirect. Wikipedia is not a directory of every school. Edison (talk) 01:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge summary to Fortuneswell. I see nothing remarkable about this school and primary schools are considered as NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.