Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underwater Cabinet Meeting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. per G12 JForget  22:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Underwater Cabinet Meeting

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NOT:Story gained very little significant coverage and did not really affect anything; Article is in a bad state; See Talk:Maldives Jhbuk (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I would Agree. While certainly an interesting news story, I do not believe it is notable for the encyclopedia at this time. Reubzz (talk) 21:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per WP:NOT. Joe Chill (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Move without redirect (to an appropriate title), and merge to Maldives. May be appropriate there.  No suggestion for an appropriate title, but clearly inappropriate for a stand-alone article, per WP:NOT.  (Delete would be fine.   Keep is not.)  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I think a delete of the article and then posting a discussion the talk page of Maldives to add this to the article, would be a prudent compromise. Reubzz (talk) 21:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I haven't yet researched this enough to give a positive recommendation, but I can see that merging with Maldives would, per WP:UNDUE, be the worst possible option. Can you really say that this really belongs in the 10,000 or so words of the most important information that can be included in the top-level article about a whole country? Would you suggest merging information about a single cabinet meeting into the United Kingdom article? If this belongs anywhere it's certainly not in the Maldives article, unless you think that we only have room for one article about the Maldives. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * My idea was to maybe put a couple of sentences of it (wikified and referenced) in a new part of the environment section about what is being done to raise awareness of global warming and what action is being taken. I should have made that clearer.Jhbuk (talk) 22:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as a copyvio of .  Anturiaethwr  Talk  01:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.