Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underwood International College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Underwood International College

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertising and corporate promo based on corporate sources. Author keeps restoring info The Banner talk 23:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  00:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  00:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I don't see what makes this different from most of other for-profit/private educational institutions, which are generally notable. Per College_and_university_article_guidelines: "In general, all colleges and universities are notable and should be included on Wikipedia." Just tag the article with peacock, advert or such templates, and if the author keeps removing them and refuse to engage in discussion, block him. If there's any reply to me here please echo me. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verified tertiary colleges are notable by long-standing precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Schools seem to be a special exception on "Every article is judged on it own merits". The Banner talk 13:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * No, degree-awarding colleges are also invariably kept. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Often based on Common Outcomes, not always on proven notability. The Banner talk 15:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * As I said, based on precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Not really a consensus. You guys just shout louder and have admins on your side. The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 18:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Funny, I always think the editors who shout loudest in this debate are the "schools aren't notable" mob! And as for admins, what a load of drivel. What earthly difference does it make whether we're admins? This, I find, is the standard response of the minority who don't like the fact that they're not the majority. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.