Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undone by Blood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Undone by Blood

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of WP:RS and WP:NFF. Was un-proded immediately without addressing the concerns. As per (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13107028/) WP:TOOSOON applies — Amkgp  💬  15:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp  💬  15:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp  💬  15:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete – too early for this, per WP:NFF. – bradv  🍁  17:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON fails WP:NFF. KylieTastic (talk) 17:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON Donaldd23 (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NFF. — Twassman &#91;Talk·Contribs&#93; 22:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Support – Strong References: https://tvweb.com/undone-by-blood-tv-series-amc-norman-reedus, https://comicbook.com/tv-shows/news/the-walking-dead-norman-reedus-produce-star-undone-by-blood-tv . — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlashUser (talk • contribs) 22:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I think a reasonable alternative may be to shift the focus of the page from the prospective TV show to a page about the comic it will be based up. While not every source in this comic book review aggregate is reliable, there are a few that would be such as Monkeys Fighting Robots and Newsarama. I think that Multiversity Comics should be usable as well?
 * In any case, I'm going to go ahead and shift the focus of the article if no one has a problem with this. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: Weak agree with . Also note that, the article creator, was blocked for sockpuppetry and repeatedly attempted to create a hoax actor [1A] [1B]. I think that the comic is notable, but the television show is not (at least WP:TOOSOON). — Twassman &#91;Talk·Contribs&#93; 17:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I've got a version ready to move over - if it's preferred, since the article creator was blocked for sockpuppetry and other mischief, I can move it over once the AfD is done and the article deleted per WP:DENY. I don't really mind either way. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * That sounds alright either way. I suppose if you incorporated material from the original article, it might be preferable to keep the original revision history? If not, then whichever you'd prefer. — Twassman &#91;Talk·Contribs&#93; 17:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I kept a source or two, but ultimately I wrote it all from scratch. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft in question - forgot to link to it! ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The draft looks good! The AfD is nearly closed (and the draft has no material from the original), so I would wait, delete, and then move the draft. (You can do whatever you want, though!) — Twassman &#91;Talk·Contribs&#93; 04:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah your version is indeed notable. Agree with . — Amkgp 💬  10:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I made some edits to your draft (added some information to the infobox, corrected a typo, and improved grammar). I hope you don't mind! — Twassman &#91;Talk·Contribs&#93; 17:54, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , what further comments do you think we need? There's a clear consensus that this subject is not notable, and has a draft ready to go about a notable topic by the same name as soon as this is deleted. –  bradv  🍁  02:06, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I was just giving it another chance. I like to do that sometimes. But, I understand impatience, too. I'm happy to delete it. Have a great holiday! Missvain (talk) 02:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.