Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unfadeable E.R.G.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-06 08:31Z 

Unfadeable E.R.G.


Article created by subject, does not establish notability. "He is considered by many to be a driving force in bringing real music back, in using real instruments in his creations." silsor 04:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)



Clone article created after AFD listing. silsor 07:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


 * According to whom? Patently unverifiable, OR, POV. Delete. - Che Nuevara  04:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Im an up and coming artist look me up. "Considered by many" no all. Do you guys not have a life besides judging everybody that trys to get ahead, read all the way to the bottom. Unfadeable E.R.G. 04:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not myspace, it's not a place to promote your act or try out liner notes. When you start moving albums and you have a review in the Village Voice and Google hits that aren't just myspace pages, this article can get recreated.--Dmz5 05:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn bio on nn artist ^ demon [omg plz] 05:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. My I suggest bundling the identical page Unfadeable (Rapper) into this as well? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as an autobiography and failing of Wikipedia is not myspace. The userpage is now on my watching list for eventual deletion. MER-C 05:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this and Unfadeable (Rapper). Only one self-published album, and obvious, probably unsurmountable, conflict of interest issues.  --Hyperbole 06:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC, WP:COI, WP:BIO. Please, stop thinking Wikipedia is myspace. Ter e nce Ong 06:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Back to the lecture at hand... Delete both. Danny Lilithborne 11:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Sharkface217 20:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Simonkoldyk 22:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.