Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unfairenheit 9/11


 * A POV rant. I vote to delete.  [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 07:16, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC) moved from main page


 * It's actually a copyvio from . - Lucky 6.9 07:36, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: What a coincidence that Bushcountry.com links to us and we're getting two "We hate Michael Moore" "articles" in a row.  Copyvio, rant, POV, "original" research.  Geogre 14:45, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clear copyvio from an article that's listed on Fahrenheit 9/11. BTW, 2 recent "anti-Michael Moore" articles in a row (from 2 different contributors I might add) is no big coincidence. We get POV articles all the time. And any website is free to link to us, regardless of their political views. There is no conspiracy. (Though I pray I don't find myself corrected if thousands of bushcountry.com (or any other ultra-POV website) hooligans descend upon the 'pedia when the election heats up.) &bull; Benc &bull; 20:29, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fire Star 22:09, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. -Sean Curtin 00:50, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete RedWolf 03:31, Aug 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete this rubbish. - UtherSRG 01:10, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Rubbish? It's no more than an editorial by Christopher Hitchens - no worse than anything one might find in, say, the New York Times; simply another opinion. Copyvio, however, so delete. DannyBoy | Talk 02:37, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zaelsius 16:43, 19 Aug 2004 (+2h)