Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unfiltered Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 03:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Unfiltered Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Fails WP:GNG. DJFace1 (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete -- per nom. Mazurkevin (talk) 02:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked for spamming. MER-C 11:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The nominator has been blocked as a spam sockpuppeteer, however I am leaving this nomination open so that it can be evaluated on its merits. MER-C 11:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The SandDoctor  Talk 00:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.