Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unfinished Monument Press (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Unfinished Monument Press
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable small press. Exactly zero Google News hits for "Unfinished Monument Press". Article was originally written by, who is affiliated with the company, making it promotional/spammy in nature. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 23:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  09:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  09:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I ran a ProQuest search and found a few glancing namechecks of it in coverage of other things (usually readings by its authors in local events calendars, but also an obituary of Daniel Jones) — but I found no coverage of the type it would take to get it over WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 15:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as searches found nothing convincingly better at all and none of this is better convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  21:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability requirements on Wikipedia due to lack of significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the article's subject. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks references that would establish notability. ShelbyMarion (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, a gsearch for awards brings up a large no. of books that UMP has published winning awards . I know that notability is not inherited but???? Also, might it be redirected/merged to James Deahl? Coolabahapple (talk) 16:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.