Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unforgivable Journey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 13:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Unforgivable Journey

 * – (View AfD)

Based on an internet search, there appears to be a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no notability is asserted or apparent from a short Google. Thryduulf (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional CRYSTALballery. --Cyber cobra (talk) 00:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, seemingly fails notability, and is a collection of predictions and guesses. Delete per WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. The only result I can find when searching for it that is directly related is Wikipedia itself. --Taelus (talk) 13:40, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable. Cerebellum (talk) 17:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete while "non-notable" may not be a valid reason for deletion, lack of verifiability certainly is. And this book series gets no Google News or Google Books hits.  I did what I could to help the article should sources surface.  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 13:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, unsourced... weirdness. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.