Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ung-ah

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 14:18, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ung-ah
Nonsense. Not notable. Nothing links to it. Need any others? :-) --Woohookitty 21:20, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Absurd, moreso as the spelling is debatable. Delete. Radiant! 21:40, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. 'Ung-ah' this article! --Neigel von Teighen 21:43, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 02:29, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Photo also looks to be copy-vio. &mdash;Neuropedia 23:29, 2005 Feb 27 (UTC)
 * ***EXPLOSION deletes this article*** er, i mean UNG-AHHHhhhhhhhh Tygar 08:28, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment -- I'd prefer to send to BJAODN. Zzyzx11 01:53, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * But that's just my sense of humour... Zzyzx11 06:46, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)