Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ung and Bereg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested.  Sandstein  14:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of the article fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N), because no reliable source has been provided to verify the existence of this administrative entity. Borsoka (talk) 07:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment Does anyone know of any article this could possibly be merged to? I tried looking around Romanian history articles briefly but couldn't find something suitable. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 11:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Googling for the second name, Seneslau de Dolha, proved succesful. I were able to find Casa de Dolha y de Petrova and Familia nobilă de Dolha și Petrova. Most interestingly, I were able to find a remnant of the very same article having existed on the English Wikipedia: House of Dolha and Petrova. It was deleted here: Articles for deletion/House of Dolha and Petrova. Probably the same fate awaits this one. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 11:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I am pretty sure that the articles were created by a member of that family (or by somebody who thinks that he/she is a member of that family). I think we need scholarly works independent of the subject of the article to substantiate its notability. Borsoka (talk) 12:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:N. --Norden1990 (talk) 12:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.