Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicist anthropology

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 21:57, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Unicist anthropology
neologism, low google hits, no hope of cleanup JPotter 19:57, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * You mean, this only one hit? del -- ( &#x263A; drini &#x266B; | &#x260E; ) 19:59, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I get 165 hits at
 * But everything seems to tie back to one guy, Peter Belohlavek, who can't seem to get his theory published in an actual science journal. I vote Delete as original research unless somebody else comes up with peer reference - --Outlander 20:25, 19 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Yes, it appears only one guy uses this term.  If/when it gains broader usage, maybe it could have an article.  Wikipedia is not for promoting every random guy with a "theory" and a website.  Friday (talk) 20:36, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per other delete voters; neologism, original research. Quale 23:50, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I get 38 unique hits when I do a proper Google search -- . User:Zoe|(talk) 23:59, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this and Unicist Theory of Evolution (AfD). jni 11:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - essentially one person's theory. --Pjacobi 12:29, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete OR, part of a systematic effort to use Wikipedia to spread heretofore nonexistent theories. -- BD2412 talk 17:13, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.