Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicommunion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:12, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Unicommunion
Delete. Not notable - Google shows only Wikipedia and mirrors. Article was previously tagged as nonsense but the author removed this and added "The addition of intellectual content can not be achieved if a reasonable amount of time is not granted for editing and additional research. Please do not delete this article, it is a serious attempt to explain some of the intricasies of quantum mechanics on a macroscopic scale." My italics. Sorry. Wikipedia is not the place for original research! Taking this through AfD to make the process visible. Cje 14:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JPD (talk) 14:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Reads like the result of hallucinogenic insight. Fan1967 14:52, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 15:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ohh, wowww... that's, like, totally deep, dude.  Suggest author become familiar with WP:NOR. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If I see another article like this, I'm going to hang myself.  [[Image:Monkeyman.png]]Monkeyman 15:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Ruby  15:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  16:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOR. Failing that, CSD G1.  - ikkyu2  ( talk ) 22:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.