Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unified commerce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Unified commerce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

To be frank, this looks like an unhelpful digression on an already unhelpful business buzzword, and none of the sources cited right now look reliable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete: Agree wholeheartedly with, sources do not look reliable. samtar (msg) 09:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Keep: According to the Wikipedia deletion policy I believe this article should not be deleted. The source is a trade publication that is well read and referenced in the ecommerce industry, and is notable because of the large amount of trade publications publishing content around the concept as it is separate from other concepts in the industry. Here is another independent and reliable source that discusses the concept http://www.computerweekly.com/news/4500249048/Unified-commerce-the-next-step-for-retailers. The concept of Unified Commerce is young, true, and as a result some mainstream publication haven't published work around it yet. However, it will last because it is so unique from other concepts in the industry. Krowe  Let's discuss   —Preceding undated comment added 14:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now and restart when better as my searches found nothing good aside from a few results at Books and browser. SwisterTwister   talk  06:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing in the searches to show that it is currently notable.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.