Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unifor Local 1285


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Unifor.  Sandstein  12:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Unifor Local 1285

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about an individual local of a national labour union, not reliably sourced as having any strong standalone notability as a separate topic from the parent organization. As always, national or international organizations do not automatically get to spin off hundreds of subarticles about each individual local chapter -- but the references here (which are contextlessly listed, rather than footnoting anything in the body text) aren't really providing strong support for independent notability: two are much more about the plant that the union members work at than they are about the local per se, and the other three are about the parent organization rather than this particular local. This is simply not enough sourcing to make Local 1285 independently notable as a separate topic from Unifor as a whole. Bearcat (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with Unifor article. Nom is correct, but this Local seems to have a strong importance within Unifor and woithin the community of Brandfort, as witness that the article for this local is longer and better-sourced than the main Unifor article. Emass100 (talk) 04:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 19:27, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.