Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uniform of the Air Cadet Organisation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 13:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Uniform of the Air Cadet Organisation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of apparent notability and suitability to be in an encyclopaedia. Whilst this may be of interest to members of the organisation, I fail to see the relevance to anyone who is not a member of the organisation. Lack of reliable sources cited indicating significant coverage. Rob 301 (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as the detail standards for the uniforms fail WP:GNG. (Perhaps the editor may consider adding to the main article for Air Cadet Organisation as that is barely more than a stub.)  Blue   Riband►   00:04, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I had thought about doing this, but as I understand it, this article was diverged from the main article on the Air Training Corps, which is itself already far too long and too detailed in my humble opinion. The Air Cadet Organisation is an article which, having looked at it, could well be merged into the Air Training Corps, and a redirect left. Any thoughts on this? Rob 301 (talk) 00:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

In my opinion, because this page is so large, it needs to stay as-is. The Uniform is a major part of Cadets (as a cadet myself, I know). We have inspections every meeting. Keep them coming :) --Mattios550 (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Mattios550 - This is true, and I do not dispute it, however, these facts do not cause the article to meet WP:GNG Rob 301 (talk) 02:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Mattios550, What is the exact relationship between the Air Training Corps and the Air Cadet Organisation? The ATC article says it's "part of" the ACO, but both articles appear to be talking about the exact same thing.Grandmartin11 (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:GNG and WP:NOTMANUAL. The "argument" that it's too big to delete works for banks, not articles. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.