Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unilever Nepal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Unilever. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 08:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Unilever Nepal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This unreferenced article seems to fail WP:NCOMPANY. BEFORE for news reveals no in-depth, reliable coverage, through there are the usual mentions in passing (press releases and their rewrites about WP:ROUTINE business activities, share prices, etc.). Out of those the best (as in, not a rewritten PR piece) would be (but it's just just a half para in a low key news outlet) and  (but it does very much read like a paid-for promo piece). There is an interesting claim in about it being the largest  manufacturing enterprise in Nepal, but don't get excited - the book is unreliable (WP:SPS) and the sentence is copied straight from the company's website. Books search shows some passing coverage of the factory being closed and then reopened, but it is generally in-passing example to illustrate trouble with Maoisit insurgency in Nepal and not any in-depth coverage, and many of those mentions or such are SPS as well. And GScholar shows in addition that some aspects of the company have been discussed in two master theses:, , but master theses, particularly from niche Indian universities, are of borderline reliability when it comes to source quality. Overall, I think this falls on the wrong side of borderline for NCOMPANY, and as such I would suggest redirecting this to parent company (Unilever). Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  12:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect - Not notable independent of Unilever group as a whole. FOARP (talk) 12:19, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect is fine here. BD2412  T 12:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:43, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * If this is redirected it should be to Hindustan Unilever, the parent company, rather than to Unilever, the grandparent. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Concur this is a preferable redirect to the one I proposed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 21:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with that. BD2412  T 04:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect - Likely outcome, but showing my support. Even if it was independently notable, there isn't enough context to justify its own page. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.