Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union City Community High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Union City Community High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No apparent notability or references available to be cited. &#124; Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 12:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

While I understand that the page (and Randolph Southern HS) may be deleted, if you look back through my history, I am systematically going through every high school in Indiana and either updating it or doing routine page maintenance. I personally believe it's up to the students / faculty / citizens of that area to fill in the information for that school, as they're more familiar with it. There should be a suitable timeframe given before nominating something for deletion especially as the article was made in good-faith - to include an Infobox.ZCash1104 (talk) 12:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: Providing there is some independent evidence that the school exists, WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES suggests that this should be considered to be notable. JMWt (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment. We don't delete high schools here and this one is easy enough to verify. • Gene93k (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:V, so keep per longstanding consensus. VMS Mosaic (talk) 01:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per SCHOOLOUTCOMES. It is listed in the Indiana Department of Education website. (Click Randolph County in the map [middle of the eastern boundary], and then on Union School Corporation.) Clarityfiend (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES isn't a policy or guideline (note the failure of such arguments at Articles for deletion/Good Shepherd English School), and it is not clear that this school meets WP:GNG, with most of the coverage local and routine. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No arguments "failed" in that discussion. It was incorrectly closed and will be going to DRV. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Gene93. John from Idegon (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Editors might be interested to discuss whether WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES should be considered to be consensus at this RfC given that this has been brought up here. JMWt (talk) 13:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as a high school. No reason to think that with local and hard copy searches sources cannot be found to meet WP:ORG. We keep high schools for very good reasons; not only do they influence the lives of thousands of people but they also play a significant part in their communities. Expansion not deletion is the way to go with such stubs. Just Chilling (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: I added some content on history, the school's origins date back to 1872.--Milowent • hasspoken 18:10, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.