Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union nationale des associations de défense des familles et de l'individu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Union nationale des associations de défense des familles et de l'individu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable French not-for-profit. Available sources are either WP:SPS or largely editorial. Nothing found to meet WP:ORGDEPTH Tgeairn (talk) 04:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Aside from the references in the article, the Google Books link above returns quite a number of discussions of this organisation, both in English and in French books. AllyD (talk) 07:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Many of the listings found in the Google Books link appear to be the same list of websites/other reading copied from one book to another. This is a very small, fringe field and the writers tend to heavily borrow from one another. Most "books" are re-compilations with some editorial commentary at best. --Tgeairn (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree about the fringe field, and have not yet come fully to a view on the notability of this organisation, but the discussion on pages 12-17 of "The New Heretics of France" seems substantial; to a lesser extent so too is the discussion on pages 195-197 of "Les Sectes" . AllyD (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The New Heretics... piece is pretty interesting. I'm not going to say that it meets WP:CORPDEPTH, but if the article does stay then it might be a good place to start from. Thanks! --Tgeairn (talk) 21:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: there is ample coverage in WP:RS: l'Express, le Monde, etc... Vrac (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:19, 3 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – Many mentions in the press. While I didn't see an in-depth profile, the mentions weren't trivial. Plus the discussion in the New Heretics book. – Margin1522 (talk) 05:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment – Also the book cited in the article on Catherine Picard. And the materials published by the organization's targets, like the Scientologists. Of course those are not RS, but they could lead to RS sources. – Margin1522 (talk) 06:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.