Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union of Chinese Nationalists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  16:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Union of Chinese Nationalists

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is nothing more than a violation of WP:SOAP, it is full of weasel words, there are no third party sources (therefore a violation of WP:V, no references, reads like someones essay or blog entry, it violates WP:NPOV, and to that end, there is nothing listed in this article that would support notability. nat.utoronto 22:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Although the article cites no sources, it appears that this is an actual online organization.  It's mentioned briefly in one issue of the newsletter of Chinese Human Rights Defenders (see  and scroll down to item 7), and there's a "Groupsite" claiming 56 members .  Most of the search hits, though, have no English-language content.  Conceivably, someone (especially someone bilingual, as I am not) could find enough sources to write a decent article, but what's here now is not worth keeping even as a starting point, because of the heavy POV.  I've removed similar content from Pan-Blue Coalition with this edit and from Kuomintang with this edit.  I suspect it will be restored unless those articles are closely monitored, a task I don't intend to undertake.  (In each article, I left in the ext link to the UOCN website.  The "See also" link to this article should be deleted if the result here is deletion.) JamesMLane t c 02:20, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - article is being used as a soapbox -- Whpq (talk) 14:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.