Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique Kings Obi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Partially based on a lack of cogent response to the source analysis table and its findings. Liz Read! Talk! 07:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Unique Kings Obi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG or any related SNG. Sources are either passing mention, primary or not independent of the subject. The only sources that give SIGCOV are obviously promotional paid puffs and connected to the subject. The Vanguard piece, and the Independent pieces , are examples. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 02:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Music,  and Nigeria.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Subject is a notable figure in Nigeria and has enough sources to prove this. The passing mentions for were added to as an evidence to a sentence. The references about the African Creators Summit were also added to evidence the information that he is the founder of the summit Mevoelo (talk)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

--Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Any comment to the source analysis? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per WP:NGRS these sources are considered generally reliable: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Vanguard is considered generally not reliable, but with all these subject would meet WP:BASIC.Hkkingg (talk) 08:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If you consider this or this a good source, then I’m afraid you do not know what a good source that is suitable for Wikipedia is. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * delete: Per nomination above.  ᗩvírαm7  •  [@píng mє]   09:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Aviram7. Why is this a speedy delete? Which WP:CSD criteria does this meet? – Novem Linguae (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey Hello, I use XFD Partipcaition tool  for vote on here, I simple tagged for delete   but I don't known how add delete before speedy sentence, and I know all WP:AFD discussion who are currently open they will be closing after 1 Week and I fixed this issue. Happy editing!  ᗩvírαm7  •  [@píng mє]   05:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Thanks for clarifying. – Novem Linguae (talk) 07:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Below is source assessment of the sources cited in this article;
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Thank you to Vanderwaalforces for the detailed source analysis. I looked at several, all of which were so clearly biased that they are worthless. When the sources are so promotional, it's no surprise that the article is too. Toadspike   [Talk]  00:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.