Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique set size


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. As to whether to merge - consensus not to delete.  Sandstein  20:15, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Unique set size

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not meet any CSD criterias, and with very little contents, unremarkable. 333-blue 08:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Possible Merge? I noticed the other set sizes in the See also section. These all seem pretty unnotable and the articles are stubs, so perhaps we could combine all three into a single article about set sizes which details the three. Then we have the individual names redirect to this article. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 13:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * merge them into process memory, a ridiculously missing article. Howver all of them are unreferenced. - üser:Altenmann >t 16:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. This appears to be an established concept with multiple independent and reliably published secondary sources. I added references to the article, which was previously unreferenced. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello, David Eppstein. Since you are familiar with the subject matter, could you perhaps look into creating a master article / explanatory list for the three set sizes Unique set size, Proportional set size, Resident set size and possibly Working set size? Also, what do you think about the idea of merging all of these articles into one singular article? --Mr. Magoo (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per David's found and added references and WP:HEY. There is also an LWN article on the introduction of USS and PSS in the Linux kernel. --Mark viking (talk) 23:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.