Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unisex Dress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Unisex. –MuZemike 23:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Unisex Dress

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Transwiki to Wiktionary at best. 黒い白い (KuroiShiroi) 21:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  23:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Unisex. As and when we have more content there on unisex clothing and fashion, we can spin this out into a separate topic.  Colonel Warden (talk) 06:49, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Colonel Warden. I wouldn't really mind having an article on unisex fashion (which we don't), but there's no deadline, and this is just a dictionary def. Claritas § 07:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Unisex. It can later expanded, if reliable sources can be added. At the moment it is just a dictionary definition. (Didn't know there was an article about unisex, thus a redirect is the better solution.) Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  11:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.