Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unisol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Logic puzzle.  MBisanz  talk 04:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Unisol

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable logic puzzle that is only printed in one newspaper; I could find exceedingly few mentions of this on Google, and most of those are WP mirrors.  ♪Tempo  di Valse ♪  22:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the article about the paper. Recognizance (talk) 23:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect and merge as above or to Logic puzzle . JJL (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No proof of notability outside of the originating newspaper. tedder (talk) 00:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Unisol is a type of logic puzzle and a specific version happens to be printed in the Sydney Morning Herald. RS are easily located with a refined Google search to exclude all the other uses of the word "Unisol". Redirecting this to the newspaper makes no sense because the paper isn't about logic puzzles, they just publish one version of this type of puzzle; the newspaper itself is a RS in this regard. This article needs to be expanded and clarified, not deleted outright. Tothwolf (talk) 02:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Clarify: Versions of this puzzle are published in multiple papers, not just the Sydney Morning Herald. The article itself mentions the Tele Sept Jeux as well. Someone should add citations for these, but they do verify with Google so WP:RS and WP:N are covered. Tothwolf (talk) 02:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.