Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Aerial Phenomena Agency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

United Aerial Phenomena Agency

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ORG. No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 16:53, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  13:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ORG. The one news hit I found was not significant (it mentions only that a person in the article is a member of the organization), and multiple reliable sources cannot be found. Arsenikk  (talk)  13:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, group is mentioned in Situation Red: The UFO Siege by Leonard H. Stringfield. SeanFromIT (talk) 20:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That does not solve the issue with WP:ORG.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete lack of non-trivial independent sources Guy (Help!) 07:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sing along with me: No-no no-no no-no-no no-no no-no-no no-no no-no-no no-no no-no notability. (Nobody can do the shing-a-ling, like I do.) --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 09:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as insufficiently notable. This group has not been the subject of non-trivial coverage by reliable, third-party published sources. A Google News Archive search produces only the one source from 1978 that Arsenikk found (above), and it is clearly a trivial mention. — Satori Son 13:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.