Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 102


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

United Airlines Flight 102

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable aviation incident. TheLongTone (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The only tragedy that occurred here was the unloading and reloading of a whole other plane and the amount of hotel vouchers United had to give out for the night. Nobody hurt outside of that bird, though you better hope those fish in Lake Conroe can't sue ;).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 15:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As The long Tone says, unremarkable. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable aviation incident....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not really a notable incident. David J Johnson (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * snow delete Does not meet our standards for WP:SIGCOV or WP:EVENTS. Mkdw talk 18:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as there are no signs of an improvable article. SwisterTwister   talk  19:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Snow Delete Aircraft incidents which cause no injuries just don't get articles.-- danntm T C 00:14, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete:all of the above!!--Petebutt (talk) 13:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails the GNG. An article about a literally-everyday event. There are almost 2,000 aircraft bird strikes per year just in Australia. YSSYguy (talk) 02:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.