Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 627 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As stated below by, this is a straight copy of the article deleted as outcome of the previous deletion discussion, so it unambiguously qualifies for speedy deletion. Also, this discussion appears to have been heading for "delete" anyway. JBW (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

United Airlines Flight 627
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was PRODED, but the tag was removed. This article fails WP:NOTNEWS and WP:PERSISTENCE. The most recent coverage of the incident is from when it actually happened. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't appear to meet Aircrash as no fatalities, no hull loss and no enduring changes to practices. Nothing seems to have changed from the previous AfD. Alansohn (talk) 03:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge with, since there were no injuries sustained in this incident, and no lasting coverage ensued. I don't know if the aircraft being written off is considered a hull loss, but that is apparently what happened. Even so, we should not have an article for every hull loss with no injuries. Note: No one has yet created List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 757, similar to other articles in the genre, such as those involving the 737 and the 777. If someone had created and populated it with articles taken from Category:Accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 757, that would have been my first choice for a merge. - StonyBrook (talk) 04:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing changed since the previous AfD (is it a G4 speedy candidate or is the article really different?). Fram (talk) 08:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and trout the article creator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. The content of the article is identical to the deleted version from 2019. (Note: I have tagged it as such but won't delete it myself; as there is a merge !vote above, I think it would be prudent to have another set of administrator eyes take a look at this to make sure I'm not mistaken.) -- Kinu t/c 20:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.