Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 634


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

United Airlines Flight 634

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Really minor incident and fails WP: AIRCRASH...No injuries (even minor), no damage to the aircraft (only the engine will likey need to be repaired), etc. Spikydan1 (talk) 05:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A fairly minor incident, for now looks like a WP:NOT case. If six - eight months from now there are still examples of continued coverage, creating an article might be appropriate then. Nsk92 (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A minor occurrence not noteworthy other than a trivial mention in the news. Blodance (talk) 06:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete' without prejudice for re-creation. There is a possibility that the aircraft will be declared a write-off, which would then possibly raise the accident above the notability threshold. At the moment, the incident doesn't meet WP:AIRCRASH. It is covered adequately elsewhere on Wikipedia. Mjroots (talk) 06:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Now confirmed as minor damage to engine only, wing undamaged. Mjroots (talk) 07:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, if it fails WP:AIRCRASH that is good enough for me. JBsupreme (talk) 06:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, minor incident. TouLouse (talk) 07:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete minor damage just a bad day at the office. MilborneOne (talk) 08:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - too minor to be included. Демоны Врубеля/Vrubel&#39;s Demons (talk) 08:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:AIRCRASH. Wikipedia is not place to tell if something happens to an airplane so that it COULD have crashed... No reason for own article if landing gear fails.  Ilyushka ☃  Talk!Contribs 13:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Minor incident. Not news, nobody will care/remember this even a month from now.   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 23:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not showing any signs of notability to qualify for an article by itself. It's really only relevant on United's article. NcSchu ( Talk ) 00:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - barely a blip on the radar. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:24, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is nothing significant about this flight. It doesn't seem to have prompted any fundamental changes in any kind of aviation safety. --Oakshade (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete delete, fails WP:AIRCRASH. Looks to be snowing. RadioFan (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm going to draw attention to wikinews:Talk:United Airlines flight makes emergency landing at Newark Airport for further reasons why this was a non-event. Sure, it was news, but that's of no value here. WP:AIRCRASH failure. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 21:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.