Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 967


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Jujutacular  talk 00:56, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

United Airlines Flight 967

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This appears to be a news item with little lasting impact, if any. Contested prod. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nom, this fails WP:AIRCRASH.Codf1977 (talk) 10:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Plane hit turbulence, some folks were injured, no fatalities. Per WP:NOTNEWS and per WP:AIRCRASH. Edison (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * keep if this entry is deleted for the reasons cited above then so should the one on China Airlines Flight 006. "Plane hit turbulence, some folks were injured, no fatalities." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.185.33.102 (talk) 14:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment' China Airlines Flight 006 was a much more severe incident, and has been covered in books on aviation accidents. There is no comparison to be made with the article under discussion. Mjroots (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable incident. Newsworthy but not encyclopediaworthy... Carrite (talk) 16:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete First contribution from a new editor, welcome to Wikipedia. That said, the passage of time shows that this is WP:NOTNEWS rather than WP:N.  There is no comparison between this one and China Airlines Flight 006, which happened in 1985, and received very significant coverage at the time (pardon the pun)  and which has been written about ever since  (2008)  (2002).  We don't have to have a fatality in order to keep an air crash article-- sometimes, the notability lies in the fact that the quick thinking of someone else averted the disaster, such as in US Airways Flight 1549 -- but the days where an emergency landing was a guarantee of an article are long past.  Mandsford 16:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Minor incident with no apparent lasting effects. Fails WP:AIRCRASH. I've given the creator some words of encouragement on his talk page and hope that this AfD doesn't drive him away from the project. Mjroots (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete just not notable. MilborneOne (talk) 20:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.