Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airports Georgia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  23:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

United Airports Georgia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references since 2011. No updates since 2012. A BEFORE search turns up nothing useful. Rhadow (talk) 00:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC) I can't speak for the Georgian language references, but the others look good. Rhadow (talk) 01:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the airports themselves presumably have articles or should, which covers all that really matters about the government owned company thst run them. Legacypac (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 01:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 01:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, if all the airports have articles, then wouldn't that make this more notable? The fact that the article hasn't been updated since 2012 doesn't mean that we should get rid of it, plenty of articles on Wikipedia have been basically "edited only by bots" for over a decade that are stubs. In it's current state it could be considered a list article which doesn't need to be referenced. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 09:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited. This article needs to pass organizational notability standards. SportingFlyer (talk) 17:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable organization, no references outside of the organization's webpage, sources on Georgian language webpage not much help either. SportingFlyer (talk) 17:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Airport authorities for countries are always notable and the stub-article can be improved.  C. W. Gilmore (talk) 15:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Airport authorities are automatically notable, overriding WP:V? Rhadow (talk) 16:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - I've rewritten it and added references, which should be enough for a stub. It's a national airport operator, and thus notable. The article is mistitled - it shd be "United Airports of Georgia" - but I'll not move it at the moment. There is a problem locating press coverage (apart from most of it being in Georgian) in that the title is translated into English in many different ways: Georgian Airports Association, Union of Airports of Georgia plus many other variations, but nevertheless I have trouble believing that any effective BEFORE could have been carried out, as I deliberately limited my own search to sources using the official form "United Airports of Georgia", which any search would have brought up.Eustachiusz (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 00:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

The issues have been addressed. Thank-you. I've moved the page and I belive this can be kept now. Legacypac (talk) 00:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article has apparently been improved.  Without consulting previous versions, it seems fine, and is indeed functioning as a list-article and as a summary about the organization.  It is useful to have in one place to be linked from each of the 5 airports that it owns, rather than having to restate the entire text in each of the 5 articles. --Doncram (talk) 08:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.