Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Capital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  17:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

United Capital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. The refs look impressive, but most of them really stretching it. Some are merely notices of funding. Some are press releases; some are self-serving interviews with the ceo. And some are so trivial as the ceo having been given an award as "Entrepreneur of the Year in Financial Services for Orange County. "  DGG ( talk ) 20:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think the Orange County award is due to it being based in Newport Beach. It looks like the award is actually a regional award from Ernst & Young . However, that's still not good enough to establish notability. I did find several references outside of what was in the article. There are some about acquisitions and some about funding, but there are also many that talk indepth about the company, , paragraph in WSJ. Here is the news section on the company website which should help keeping it straight from other "United Capital" companies out there . --CNMall41 (talk) 21:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - On a side note, the tone of the article pretty much falls in the promotional category so I would suggest a gutting or rewording of most of the content. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, per nom. Too many passing mentions and routine listings. I have also nominated Financial life management for deletion (here), because the phrase appears to be used exclusively as branding by the company. There might be a connection. Grayfell (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now but restart later if needed as I haven't looked closely but I'm not seeing anything convincingly better. SwisterTwister   talk  20:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  15:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Albeit weak, a couple of sources used are iffy and it's littered with puffery. Satisfies WP:GNG imo though but not written well at all currently. Suggest cutting all the over-substantiation. Jppcap (talk) 22:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:54, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.