Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Football Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting that the alleged abuse of process did not actually occur, as that comment misrepresented my closure of the AFD which was alluded to here. ✗ plicit  02:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The result was redirect to Adelaide Plains Football League per WP:ATD (as requested). ✗  plicit  12:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

United Football Club

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per the recently closed Articles for deletion/Hamley Bridge Football Club, this club represents two local villages, Dublin, South Australia and Long Plains, South Australia with populations of around 250 and 70 that play against each other local villages. Given that around 12% of Australians are males between 15-35 years old, that means that these villages have around 30 prime-aged males to select for their teams, so basically everyone would end up in this team, and these clubs are nowhere near notable in terms of sporting merit. The only refs are village newspapers or the books by Peter Lines on rural local football teams, which are self-published books Bumbubookworm (talk) 05:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  00:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment -, the consensus was to deal with these one at a time, not give you license to just run the lot of them again together. Can you please withdraw the nomination for all of these except one so proper consideration can be given to each AfD debate, and run them ONE at a time? Deus et lex (talk) 11:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep for failure to properly run this AfD. Deus et lex (talk) 10:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. as per above.Best Regards.--- ✨Lazy Maniik✨  02:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Sockpuppet of blocked user . ✗  plicit  14:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The closing admin may wish to review User talk:Lazy Maniik/Archives/2021/October before putting much weight on this comment. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:55, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clearly a minor amateur sports club.--Grahame (talk) 06:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment -, at least 4 have been nominated at the same time, and on the same day that the previous AfD was closed, in direct contradiction to the consensus reached earlier. It's disruptive. Deus et lex (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment PMC didn't even relist this discussion. Please do not copy paste messages across multiple deletion discussions; that can be considered disruptive. Sennecaster  ( Chat ) 12:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I've replied at Articles for deletion/Two Wells Football Club. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nom, notability not demonstrated. Alternative would be a merge to Adelaide Plains Football League. No need for a speedy close, correct AfD process has been followed as discussed at Articles for deletion/Two Wells Football Club. Nelertasta (talk) 03:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.