Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom Backgammon Federation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:53, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

United Kingdom Backgammon Federation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable organisation, only cites close primary sources, and a search finds nothing better (searched with 'United Kingdom', 'UK', and 'UKBGF', before anyone asks). Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see this as notable. A search on Google Books has some secondary sources, but still the article is going to be very short based on what's in them. I don't see it as worth keeping. Epa101 (talk) 17:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Organizations,  and United Kingdom. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.