Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep per below (5x edit conflict). It should also be noted that this represents a substantial proportion of the nominator's edits. MER-C 05:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

United Nations
Perhaps the most worthless wiki drek I've seen. I would rather see this go from all the NPOV vios, type-o's, etc than to fix all of the badness. I'm sorry. You may note this is the first edit I've made - but I have plenty of experience with Wikipedia - I just have lots of aliases and anonymous IP editing. --Meryl Kiniry 04:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Bad faith nom. Article is not in great shape but there's no argument for deletion here. Nom may be violating WP:POINT Bwithh 04:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as a bad-faith nom, and salt the user who created this. Note, this user account appears to be a one-shot.  --Dennisthe2 05:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What do you mean "Salt"? --Meryl Kiniry 05:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep dumb. Danny Lilithborne 05:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The nominator is disrupting the afd process through changing votes and also seems to be messing around with admin block tags on another user's page. Bwithh 05:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * User talk:Bigblackguy890 that is, but he deserves to have his talk page v-protected, believe it --Meryl Kiniry 05:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * And what's your defense for this edit? Danny Lilithborne 05:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep and block user. Resolute 05:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ahh that's an over-reaction. --Meryl Kiniry 05:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.