Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Roma Party of Kosovo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen (talk) 01:12, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

United Roma Party of Kosovo

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Appears to be a very minor political party, about which not much is known other than that it exists. I looked around but did not finding anything in the nature of focused and specific coverage, just a few passing mentions. The party got 0.2% of the vote in the 2004 Kosovo elections and does have one legislator represented in the Kosovo parliament. I think under such circumstances it is appropriate to have an article about that legislator but not about the party. Does not pass WP:ORG, in my opinion. A prod was contested. Nsk92 (talk) 12:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, nom appears contradictory. Surprised to find WP:ORG does not specifically mention parties, but my very general unsourced observation is that one seat in a national government does support an article. Does meet the "noncommercial" section of WP:ORG (inconveniently called WP:CLUB). If more sources turn up for the man than the party, name can be changed later. JJB 15:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, per JJB comments.  He  iro  18:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep parties successfully running candidates in elections are notable. Suggest SNOW.    DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.