Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Adjusters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete --Selket Talk 03:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

United States Adjusters

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:CORP notability standard. References presented are in regard to "public adjusters" in general or other public adjuster corporations, they don't concern this specific corporation.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotional/advertising; user has an obvious conflict of interest (and has a history of promoting his company/ideas). --Dirk Beetstra T  C 13:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * NOTE: I have semiprotected the article for a week. Socks from User:Bet1973 (who created the article in the first place) keep on removing the AFD notice.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 14:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * redir to Claims adjuster or Public adjuster(closers choice). But as is stands now it is just corporate spam available from any number of press releases. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  13:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete & salt, it's advertising by a user with an obvious conflict of interest and a history of disruptively promoting his company. Redirection isn't appropriate here since the title is the name of a company. -- Versa geek  12:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the sources do not appear to be reliable, nor show notability. Is there anything from a major daily paper about this company, not just a press blurb that shows how it helped some city in Florida? Bearian (talk) 18:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.