Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Allied Freedom Fighters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

United States Allied Freedom Fighters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP material without sources  DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Hardly readable,not notable, very biased, zero sourcing of any kind.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Incoherent, and the claimed details are highly unlikely. Nick-D (talk) 06:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2014 Ninoy Aquino International Airport bombing plot. Potentially a terrorist organization, but the question is WP:ORG & WP:GNG. Subject has received coverage of various depth from multiple reliable sources in the Philippines including the Philippine Star, ABS-CBN News, and others. But further inspection of the sources, show that they are primarily regarding a foiled bombing plot, with the organization and "chief of staff" of the organization almost all mentioned in any depth in relation to the foiled bombing plot. The bombing plot itself, has received significant coverage sufficient to meet WP:EVENT, including from sources outside of the Philippines in CNN, Reuters, Breitbart, International Business Times, and Gulf News. Therefore, as the organization is known primarily for a single event, WP:BLP1E could be construed to suggest a redirect to an article about the foiled plot would be the best result for the subject of this AfD.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to a red link? Are you serious? Kraxler (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * And why not? The event which this organization has received passing coverage has received significant coverage in its own right, sufficient to pass WP:PERSISTENT. Therefore, the event, which does not have an article yet created, is notable. And unless this organization is notable for anything else other than than plot, than it falls under WP:BLP1E or something similar.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * RE "And why not?" - Because of G8, see Criteria for speedy deletion and Redirect #7. Kraxler (talk) 15:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The sources primary subject is the bomb plot, and it clearly meets WP:EVENT. The subject of this AfD has received multiple mentions in relations to the notable event, and thus is a related term. Whether the organization meets WP:ORG IMHO is not the question, but it is the fact that it is only notable for a single notable event, and thus should be redirected to that event (an article that should be created).--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * So, create the article first, and then advocate something to be redirected to it. Please do not put the cart before the horse. Kraxler (talk) 13:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Per WP:CANVASS, I will inform WP:PINOY. As there maybe some local editors, they can shed light on the situation.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.